ArticleBMC rheumatology2025
Financial burden of systemic lupus erythematosus in India: prevalence and predictors of catastrophic health expenditure in a multicentre cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe estimated the frequency of catastrophic healthcare expenditure(CHE), and their determinants in Indian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE).
methodsThis was a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey conducted by the Lupus Special Interest Group of the Indian Rheumatology Association across 14 centers. Patients with SLE diagnosed as per SLICC-2012 on follow-up for at least 1-year were interviewed regarding annual disease-related expenditures including direct (medical and non-medical) and indirect costs. CHE was defined as > 20% of the annual income. Results are presented in Indian currency (INR), wherein 100 INR = 1.19 USD = 1.1 EURO.
resultsWe included 655 patients with SLE [92.7% women], with a mean age of 32.9 ± 11.6 years. The median direct annual expenditure was INR 52400(30810,96300), largest component being cost of medications [INR 24000(12000,40000) and hospitalizations [INR 35000(14400,90000)] One-third of patients(n = 237,36.2%) suffered CHE; they were older [AOR1.01(0.99,1.03)], had lower level of education [AOR1.95(1.01,3.81)], belonged to lower socio-economic-strata[AOR 9.63(5.66,16.4)], had renal and/or neuropsychiatric lupus [AOR1.42(0.99,2.06)] and higher damage(SDI) [AOR1.84(1.22,2.77)]. The median annual indirect cost was INR16416(5016,52896). Three-fourths(73.7%) of the participants incurred out-of-pocket expenses for their healthcare. The employed population was low(n = 187;28.3%), and the absenteeism rate was 24%.
conclusionHospitalization and medication costs are major factors driving exponentially high out-of-pocket expenses, resulting in CHE in one-third of patients with SLE in India. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.