ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Effects of prenatal bifidobacterium supplementation on the gut microbiome in preterm infants of preeclamptic mothers.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study examined the relationship between maternal preeclampsia (PE) and gut microbiota colonization in preterm infants and analyzed the effects of prenatal Bifidobacterium supplementation.
methodsThis observational study included 45 preterm infants categorized according to their mothers' exposure status during pregnancy. Group A (healthy controls, n = 15) included infants born to healthy mothers who received no supplementation; Group B (PE+Bifidobacterium, n = 15) included infants whose mothers had PE and received Bifidobacterium supplementation as part of routine clinical management; and Group C (PE only, n = 15) included infants born to mothers with PE who did not receive Bifidobacterium supplementation. All enrolled infants were followed from birth for subsequent analyses. The initial postnatal fecal samples of the infants were collected and analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Microbial diversity within the intestinal microbiota was evaluated using alpha diversity (within-sample) and beta diversity (between-sample) analyses. To identify taxon-specific differences among groups, we performed linear discriminant analysis effect size and differential abundance analysis, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. The functional potential of the gut microbiota was inferred based on Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways via the PICRUSt2 algorithm.
resultsAlpha diversity analysis revealed significantly greater microbial diversity in the fecal microbiota of preterm infants born to healthy mothers (Group A) than in those delivered by mothers with PE, regardless of prenatal Bifidobacterium exposure. Taxonomic profiling revealed distinct microbial community structures across groups: Group A exhibited significant enrichment of Bacteroides at all taxonomic levels, along with an elevated abundance of Clostridium at the class and order levels. Group B showed a markedly greater relative abundance of Actinobacteria at the phylum level and Rothia at the genus level, whereas Group C was dominated by Proteobacteria (phylum level) and Streptococcus (genus level). All intergroup differences were statistically significant following Benjamini‒Hochberg correction (q < 0.05). A functional analysis of the gut microbiota revealed 53 KEGG pathways with significant overall group differences (p < 0.05), among which 23 pathways were significantly different in at least two groups (q < 0.05). Notably, the activity of the LPS biosynthesis pathway was significantly upregulated in Group C compared with Group A (q = 0.001). Although LPS biosynthesis activity was reduced in Group B relative to Group C (q = 0.018), it remained elevated compared to Group A (q = 0.001), suggesting incomplete mitigation of endotoxin risk. Additionally, glycolytic activity was significantly impaired in Group C relative to Group A (q = 0.003) but was partially restored in Group B compared to Group C (q = 0.022).
conclusionsMaternal PE impaired early-life gut microbiota establishment in preterm infants, manifesting in reduced microbial diversity, enrichment of pathogenic Proteobacteria and Streptococcus, and consequent functional dysbiosis characterized by elevated endotoxin biosynthesis potential and compromised energy metabolism. Although prenatal supplementation with Bifidobacterium partially restored the microbial compositional balance, promoting beneficial bacteria, reducing LPS synthesis activity, and partially improving glycolytic function, it failed to fully reverse endotoxin-related risks, indicating the need to develop more effective microbiota-targeted strategies to comprehensively optimize metabolic and immune homeostasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.