Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199328›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Exploring Chinese EFL teachers' perceptions and experiences of positive psychology use in language education: benefits, challenges, and requirements disclosed.

Zhaoping Jiang, Jiting Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhaoping JiangDepartment of Fundamental Education, Anhui Police College, Hefei, 230000, Anhui, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3583-3845
Jiting WuSchool of Microelectronics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230000, Anhui, China. 2018171038@mail.hfut.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2720-7207

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise of positive psychology (PP) has inspired educators in different fields to move toward positivity and emotionality. An emerging venue for PP has been second/foreign language (L2) education given its emotional essence. While many studies are exploring various aspects of PP in English as a foreign language (EFL) contexts, they are mostly correlational. Nevertheless, teachers' perceptions and experiences of PP use in EFL classes have remained under-explored. To fill this gap, this study aimed to examine Chinese EFL teachers' perceptions about the use, benefits, setbacks, and requirements of applying PP in L2 education. To this end, a sample of 21 Chinese EFL teachers with various educational and pedagogical profiles attended a semi-structured interview. The findings indicated that Chinese EFL teachers perceived various benefits for PP use including its capacity to generate positive emotions, stop and reduce negative emotions, improve professional expertise and feelings, establish positive, friendly, and interactive learning environments, and strengthen one's character. Concerning challenges, it was found that PP application had been tough in China because of its logistic demands, teacher-related and learner-related factors (e.g., personality, needs, and openness to diversity/change), polices and rules, and the need for training. Moreover, the findings showed that PP use requires positive classroom climates, attitudes, and relationships, along with special training, emotional literacy, individualized instruction, school support and resources, and a humanistic teaching style. The study discusses the findings and implications for EFL teachers and educators, who can realize the benefits, challenges, and requirements of PP use in L2 classes.

Indexed as

MultilingualismSchool TeachersAdultChinaEast Asian PeopleEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedEducational psychologyEFL teacherEmotionsPositive psychology (PP)Teacher perceptions

Identifiers

PMID41199328
PMCPMC12590589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.