Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199307›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025

Strategies and challenges in containing antimicrobial resistance in East Africa: a focus on laboratory-based surveillance.

Andrea Molina, Théogène Ihorimbere, Néhémie Nzoyikorera, Eunice Jennifer Nambozo, Saudah Namubiru, Susan Nabadda, Godfrey Pimundu, Susan Mahuro Githii, Gwokpan Awin Nykwe, Abe G Abias and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Andrea MolinaDepartment Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, 20359, Hamburg, Germany. andrea.molina@bnitm.de.
Théogène IhorimbereNational Reference Laboratory, Institut National de Santé Publique, Ministry of Health and Fight against AIDS, Bujumbura, Burundi.
Néhémie NzoyikoreraNational Reference Laboratory, Institut National de Santé Publique, Ministry of Health and Fight against AIDS, Bujumbura, Burundi.
Eunice Jennifer NambozoCentral Public Health Laboratories, National Health Laboratories, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Saudah NamubiruCentral Public Health Laboratories, National Health Laboratories, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Susan NabaddaCentral Public Health Laboratories, National Health Laboratories, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Godfrey PimunduCentral Public Health Laboratories, National Health Laboratories, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Susan Mahuro GithiiNational Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Gwokpan Awin NykweNational Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Juba, Republic of South Sudan.
Abe G AbiasNational Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Juba, Republic of South Sudan.
Felician L MsigwaNational Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Dar es Salam, Tanzania.
Reuben NdagulaNational Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Dar es Salam, Tanzania.
Nyambura MoremiNational Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Dar es Salam, Tanzania.
Flora RwanyagatareBiomedical Services Department, Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.
Josiane TuyishimireBiomedical Services Department, Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.
Therese MukankwiroBiomedical Services Department, Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.
Noel GahamanyiBiomedical Services Department, Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.
Isabelle MukagatareBiomedical Services Department, Biomedical Centre, Kigali, Rwanda.
Maike LamshöftDepartment Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, 20359, Hamburg, Germany.
Julien A NguinkalDepartment Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, 20359, Hamburg, Germany.
Emmanuel AcholHealth Department, East African Community (EAC), Arusha, Tanzania.
Hakim I LaguHealth Department, East African Community (EAC), Arusha, Tanzania.
Eric NzeyimanaHealth Department, East African Community (EAC), Arusha, Tanzania.
Jürgen MayDepartment Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, 20359, Hamburg, Germany.
Florian GehreDepartment Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, 20359, Hamburg, Germany.
Muna AffaraDepartment Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, 20359, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is increasing worldwide, undermining strides in public health and the economy, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Africa is the continent with the highest death rate attributed to antimicrobial-resistant infections. There is a lack of information on AMR mitigation strategies and their implementation in the region. The aim of this study was to analyze national strategies to tackle AMR with focus on AMR surveillance in the East African Community (EAC) and their implementation status including the analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.

methodsWithin our expert group (composed of representatives from the National Public Health Laboratories (NPHL), Ministries of Health of Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, and Uganda) we used a qualitative approach to analyze AMR National Action Plans (NAPs), AMR surveillance programs, publications and reports on the AMR situation and strategies in the EAC.

resultsWe found varying levels of implementation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) strategies among East African Community (EAC) Partner States. For example, progress in key steps for the sustainable implementation of National Action Plans on AMR (AMR-NAPs) ranged from 7% in Burundi to 94% in Kenya. The overall accomplishment of the WHO checklist for AMR surveillance also varied: 44% in South Sudan, 61% in Burundi, 89% in Rwanda, 94% in Tanzania, and 100% in both Uganda and Kenya. Within EAC Partner States, the detection of bacterial pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles is coordinated by national reference laboratories. Most EAC countries have established AMR surveillance systems. However, challenges such as limited laboratory testing capacity, low representativeness of surveillance data, lack of integration among existing systems, and financial constraints undermine efforts to curb AMR.

conclusionsRegional collaboration among EAC Partner States is essential for an effective and sustainable response to antimicrobial resistance. Strengthening joint efforts will enable countries to share resources, harmonize surveillance systems, and address common challenges more efficiently. The EAC Regional Network of Reference Laboratories is one example of a regional mechanism that can support such collaboration. The findings of this study will inform the development of a regional AMR strategy focused on laboratory-based surveillance and help guide the prioritization of technical and financial support across the EAC region.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialAfrica, EasternHumansLaboratoriesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAMR national action planAMR surveillanceAntimicrobial resistanceEast african community (EAC)One health

Identifiers

PMID41199307
PMCPMC12593786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.