ArticleBMC nursing2025
Self-perceived design thinking competence among Taiwanese nursing students: a longitudinal study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDesign thinking (DT) is increasingly valued in nursing education for cultivating innovation and problem-solving skills. Although individual differences in DT competence are recognized, the pattern of change in these competencies over time remains unclear.
methodsNinety-six nursing students enrolled in a DT training course completed the Creative Synthesis Inventory–Taiwan (CSI–Taiwan) at four time points: before training, immediately after training, and one- and three-months post-training. Students were classified into higher- and lower-scoring groups using K-means clustering. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) were used to analyze changes in CSI–Taiwan scores over time.
resultsGEE analysis showed no significant differences in visualization, discovery, prototyping, and evaluation skills immediately after training. Both higher- and lower-scoring students demonstrated significant declines in all DT skills over time. The magnitude of decline was significantly smaller among higher-scoring students, except for the discovery skill between immediately after training and one-month post-training.
conclusionsThese findings align with Bandura’s self-efficacy theory, suggesting that efficacious self-beliefs in DT competence are reflected in differing patterns of change over time. Nursing curricula incorporating longitudinal, spiral models of DT instruction—such as project-based applications in clinical settings—may help consolidate and sustain DT skills, particularly among lower-scoring students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.