ArticleBMC nursing2025
Improving pressure injury assessment skills of nursing students' using in-situ simulation and moulage: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06406504 (A Realistic Experience in Improving Pressure Injury Classification and Assessment Skills), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Realistic Experience in Improving Pressure Injury Classification and Assessment Skills: In Situ Simulation and Moulage
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is very important to use new teaching methods to improve the skills of classification and assessment of pressure injuries of nursing students who will provide direct care to patients after graduation. This study evaluated the effectiveness of in-situ simulation and moulage in improving nursing students' pressure injury classification and assessment skills.
methodsThis randomized controlled trial was completed with 84 senior nursing students. Students participating in the study were randomly assigned to the in-situ simulation, in-laboratory simulation, and control group.
resultsIt was found that students in the in-situ simulation group had significantly higher knowledge test (post-test) scores than the control group (p < 0.05). Students in the in-situ and in- laboratory simulation groups had significantly higher correct classification percentages and performance scores for both laboratory and clinical assessment of pressure injury than students in the control group (p < 0.05).
conclusionMoulage is a useful tool for developing and transferring nursing students' pressure injury classification and assessment abilities to the clinical setting when used with both in-situ and in-laboratory simulation methods.
trial registrationRetrospective registration was completed on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06406504, registered on 2024-05-06).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.