ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025
Human-centred design thinking: a novel tool for co-creation in physical activity research.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Making space to listen: engaging people with a chronic condition and various health literacy levels as citizen researchers.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the substantial health benefits of physical activity across the lifespan, most youth and adults are insufficiently physically active. To combat this trend, numerous policies and interventions have been developed, many of which have had modest effects. The limited effectiveness of such interventions has been linked to the lack of or minimal community involvement. Consequently, there have been calls for solutions with greater community buy-in. In particular, there has been a rise in the use of co-creation in physical activity research, where stakeholders are engaged in understanding and defining problems and designing localised and contextual solutions. While there are many benefits to co-creation (for example, collaboration and empowerment), there are also challenges, including the underreporting of co-creation approaches and methodologies used in physical activity research. We argue that human-centred design thinking can be a tool for approaching, complementing, and elevating co-creation. We discuss human-centred design thinking and offer strengths for how it can augment co-creation, such as through the Double Diamond model, toolkits and field guides, established activities, reporting guideline's and asking different questions to spark social innovation. We also present a case study to showcase how human-centred design thinking as an approach to co-creation can look.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.