ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2025
Sex differences in the prognostic value of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio for coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events in people with type 2 diabetes and normoalbuminuria.
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sex Differences in the Cardiovascular Significance of Albuminuria in Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUrinary albumin excretion is an established marker of cardiovascular (CV) risk in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, its prognostic significance within the normoalbuminuric range (< 30 mg/g) remains uncertain, particularly regarding sex-specific differences. This study examined whether urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR; KDIGO A1 range) is associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) severity and 6-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in women and in men with T2DM and preserved kidney function (eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m², UACR < 30 mg/g), treating sex differences as a co-primary objective.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study involving adults with T2DM who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography. Baseline associations between log-transformed UACR, CAD severity, CV risk factors, and inflammatory markers were evaluated using multivariable linear regression. MACE (defined as non-fatal myocardial infarction or unstable angina requiring urgent revascularization, stroke, or CV death) were recorded during 6-year of follow-up. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, smoking, BMI, lipid profile, hs-CRP, and ACEI/ARB use, were used to assess UACR-MACE associations.
resultsWe included 420 adults (180 women, 42.9%) with a mean of age 65.3 ± 10.7 years and a median UACR 7.56 mg/g (IQR 4.12-15.5). Significant CAD was present in 310 participants (73.8%), and 78 experienced MACE during follow-up (35.5%). Higher UACR was independently associated with greater coronary stenosis (adjusted R² = 0.090, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly higher incidence of MACE in the highest UACR tertile (log-rank p = 0.039). In multivariable Cox models adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, smoking, lipid profile, hs-CRP, SSI, and ACEI/ARB use, higher log-UACR independently predicted MACE (adjusted HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.35-2.10; p < 0.01). In sex-stratified Cox models, higher log-UACR predicted MACE in both sexes and remained independently associated in multivariable analyses (adjusted HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.35-2.10; p < 0.01). Associations were directionally stronger in women, who showed higher cumulative event rates across UACR tertiles, although the formal UACR × sex interaction did not reach statistical significance.
conclusionsWithin the normoalbuminuric range, UACR is associated with greater CAD burden and higher 6-year MACE risk, with sex-specific differences. These findings suggest potential sex-related variation in the prognostic value of high-normal albuminuria, particularly among women, warranting validation in larger and more diverse cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.