ArticleBMC biology2025
Agathis vs. Hymenaea-trapping biases to interpret arthropod assemblages in ambers.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resin does not safeguard insect DNA during early decay despite preservation of soft tissues.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe genera Agathis (Coniferales: Araucariaceae) and Hymenaea (Fabales: Fabaceae) contain resin-producing tree species that are crucial for actuotaphonomic studies. While certain Cretaceous ambers likely originated from Agathis or Agathis-like trees, Hymenaea is the primary source of many Miocene ambers. Field studies were conducted in New Caledonia and Madagascar to collect Defaunation resin (resin produced after 1760 AD (Anno Domini)). Arthropods were collected with yellow sticky and Malaise traps in New Caledonia, Madagascar, and Mexico. Cretaceous and Miocene ambers, copals (2.58 Ma to 1760 AD), and Defaunation resins from various regions were analysed to compare arthropod trapping patterns.
resultsActuotaphonomic results show lower number of arthropods trapped in Agathis Defaunation resin, with a non-uniform distribution, compared to the abundant and uniformly distributed arthropods trapped in Hymenaea Defaunation resin. The lower number of arthropod inclusions in the trunk resin of the Agathis trees is attributed to the rapid polymerisation of that resin. Under the same experimental conditions, the arthropods in Agathis Defaunation resin plot far from the arthropods collected in the yellow sticky and Malaise traps, while the arthropods in Hymenaea Defaunation resin plot close to the arthropods in the yellow sticky traps.
conclusionsThese findings confirm different resin trapping patterns between Agathis and Hymenaea, with significant implications for interpreting the amber record. The fauna trapped by Hymenaea resin closely resembles the arthropod biocoenosis that live in and around the trunks, indicating autochthony and close relationship with the forest ecosystem, unlike Agathis resin. These results improve our understanding of arthropod trapping biases in resin and lead us to reconsider previously proposed interpretations of Cretaceous forest biocoenoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.