ArticleBMC medical education2025
Diversity in medicine: how do underrepresented minority medical students select their specialty? A cross-sectional survey study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs the diversity of the U.S. population increases, it is important to reflect this racial/ethnic diversity across all specialties in medicine. The primary objective of this study was to identify factors influencing specialty decision-making amongst underrepresented in medicine (URM) medical students. The secondary objectives were to identify biases and stressors experienced by URM medical students and to understand perceived support in specialty decision-making.
methodsIn this cross-sectional survey study, a 55-item questionnaire was distributed electronically to the national and local email lists for the Student National Medical Association (SNMA) and Latino Medical Student Association (LMSA). Eligibility criteria included U.S. medical students self-identifying as URM.
resultsAmong the 257 respondents, the top five desired specialties were obstetrics and gynecology (11.7%), emergency medicine (10.1%), pediatrics (9.3%), internal medicine (8.2%), and orthopedics (6.6%). When stratified by gender and race/ethnicity, differences were observed in desired specialties among Hispanic and Black males and females. The top three characteristics with a major or significant influence on specialty choice included the nature of patient care (94.1%), patient population (78.6%), and working hours/lifestyle (70.4%). Over half of respondents (55.9%) reported that mentorship within their chosen specialty had a significant or major influence on their specialty choice. Additionally, the majority (69.9%) agreed or strongly agreed that racial/ethnic concordant mentorship was likely to influence their specialty decision.
conclusionsLarger and specialty-focused studies, particularly for the least diverse specialties in medicine, are needed to characterize the facilitators and barriers that influence URM students in their specialty choice. Ultimately, these efforts may help reduce barriers to matriculation of URMs in their desired specialty and also foster a more representative physician workforce, and in the long-term, advance health outcomes for diverse patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.