Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199230›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2025

Radiological characteristics for guiding intra-arterial therapy in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Chao An, Guanglei Zheng, Jiaoqing Zhou, Ran Wei, Peihong Wu, Mengxuan Zuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chao An *Department of Minimal Invasive Intervention, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651, Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, Province Guangdong, 510060, P.R. China.
Guanglei Zheng *Department of Minimal Invasive Intervention, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651, Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, Province Guangdong, 510060, P.R. China.
Jiaoqing Zhou *Department of International Radiology and Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Province Guangdong, 510630, P.R. China.
Ran WeiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Province Guangdong, 510080, P.R. China.
Peihong Wu *Department of Minimal Invasive Intervention, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651, Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, Province Guangdong, 510060, P.R. China. wuph@sysucc.org.cn.
Mengxuan Zuo *Department of Minimal Invasive Intervention, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651, Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, Province Guangdong, 510060, P.R. China. zuomx@sysucc.org.cn.

Funding

National Key Research And Development Plan 2022YFC3401000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate and contrast the efficacy and safety of trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on varying radiologic patterns.

methodsA retrospective study identified 3,060 consecutive patients with intermediate-stage HCC who underwent initial TACE or HAIC between January 2009 and December 2022. HCC radiological features were categorized into pseudo-capsulated, pseudocapsule breakthrough, confluent multinodular, and infiltrative types. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was employed to minimize selection bias. The progression-free survival (PFS) was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Independent prognostic factors were assessed using a forward stepwise Cox regression model in multivariable analyses.

resultsAfter propensity score matching, each group in the infiltrative HCC cohort included 237 patients, while the non-infiltrative HCC cohort comprised 262 patients per group. Notably, radiologic patterns were shown with statistical significance in three groups with different tumor burden (P < 0.001). Pseudo-capsulated type was dominant (55.6%) in < 6 cohorts, and infiltrative type was dominant (49.5%) in > 12 cohorts. A higher PFS was observed in the HAIC group compared to the TACE group in the infiltrative HCC cohort (P < 0.001), but comparable PFS was found between the two groups in the non-infiltrative HCC cohort (P = 0.532). In the multivariate analysis, both tumor burden and radiologic morphology showed significant associations with PFS.

conclusionsHAIC showed favorable outcomes in infiltrative HCC and might warrant further consideration in treatment planning.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansInfusions, Intra-ArterialMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesHepatic arterial infusion chemotherapyHepatocellular carcinomaPropensity score matchingRadiologic patternTrans-arterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID41199230
PMCPMC12590844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.