ArticleBMC public health2025
Workplace relational injustice and authoritarian treatment as risk factors for sexual harassment at a large Swedish university: results from a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorkplace sexual harassment remains a persistent issue in Sweden. Research about organisational antecedents has been criticised for being limited in scope, possibly overlooking contextual factors relevant for the occurrence of sexual harassment. This study examined two factors capturing aspects of organisational climate, perceived relational justice and authoritarian treatment, and their association to workplace sexual harassment in a Swedish university setting.
methodsCross-sectional data from a 2019 survey targeting all Lund University employees was used. Validated instruments were employed to measure relational justice, authoritarian treatment and sexual harassment. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses, stratified by gender, were conducted using Poisson regression models and additive interaction analysis performed, calculating synergy index (SI) and relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI).
resultsThe adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) of sexual harassment was statistically significantly higher among participants who perceived low relational justice (RJ), with a PR of 1.8 (95% CI 1.3-2.6) among women and PR 2.2 (95% CI 1.01-4.6) among men. A similar pattern was seen among participants who perceived high authoritarian treatment (AT), with a PR of 2.0 (95% CI 1.4-2.9) among women and PR 3.4 (95% CI 1.7-6.9) among men. Interaction analyses indicated that women and participants with a foreign background perceiving low relational justice or high authoritarian treatment have a higher probability of sexual harassment compared to men and participants with a Swedish background with the same perceptions. Furthermore, that participants with low or non-academic positions perceiving low relational justice have a lower probability of sexual harassment compared to those with high academic positions.
conclusionOur findings suggest that superiors' unjust or authoritarian treatment of employees might be contextual factors contributing to workplace sexual harassment, disproportionally affecting women, employees with a foreign background or high academic positions. To ensure evidence-based interventions, researchers should incorporate organisational risk factors in the design and evaluation of workplace interventions aimed at reducing sexual harassing behaviours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.