Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199224›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Risk stratification and prediction of emergency delivery in early-onset preeclampsia using machine learning.

Yanhong Xu, Xinying Liu, Ying Zhang, Xingyi Qi, Chengcheng Jin, Zewei Liang, Xia Xu, Jianying Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yanhong Xu *College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, PR China.
Xinying Liu *College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, PR China.
Ying ZhangCollege of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, PR China.
Xingyi QiCollege of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, PR China.
Chengcheng JinCollege of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, PR China.
Zewei LiangCollege of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, PR China.
Xia XuCollege of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, PR China. xuxia0623@fjmu.edu.cn.
Jianying YanCollege of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, PR China. yanjyfjmu@163.com.

Funding

Fujian Provincial Health Technology Project 2024ZD01005Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 2024Y0035innovation of science and Technology, Fujian Province 2020Y9401oint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology,Fujian province 2024Y9536Startup Fund for scientific research, Fujian Medical University 2024QH2047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly-onset preeclampsia (PE) poses significant risks for maternal and fetal outcomes, particularly when emergency delivery is required. This study aimed to develop machine learning models to predict emergency delivery within 48 h of PE diagnosis, facilitating timely clinical interventions.

methodsWe analyzed a retrospective cohort of 648 singleton pregnancies diagnosed with PE at Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital from 2014 to 2024, with gestational ages ranging from 28 to 34 weeks. Patients were stratified into emergency delivery (≤ 48 h post-diagnosis, n = 174) and non-emergency groups (n = 474). Feature selection was performed via univariate analysis, collinearity testing, and logistic regression, yielding 16 predictors. Eight machine learning models (logistic regression, naïve Bayes, XGBoost, LightGBM, SVM, GBDT, MLP, elastic net) were trained and evaluated for discriminative power and calibration. SHAP analysis was employed to interpret model predictions.

resultsXGBoost demonstrated superior performance (testing AUROC: 0.908) with excellent calibration, while GBDT achieved high AUROC (0.931) but poorer calibration. SHAP analysis identified CRP, D-dimer, and hypoproteinemia as the most influential predictors.

conclusionsMachine learning models effectively predict emergency delivery in early-onset PE using clinically interpretable features. Integration into obstetric practice may enhance risk stratification, though prospective validation is warranted.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricMachine LearningPre-EclampsiaAdultBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentEmergency deliveryMachine learningPredictive modelPreeclampsiaXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41199224
PMCPMC12593787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.