Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199209›Full record

Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2025

Pulmonary function in non-hospitalized adults and children after mild COVID-19: a single-centre prospective cohort study.

Alexandra R Görges, Philipp Warnke, Micha Löbermann, Antonia Zapf, Julia Weitzel, Maya-L Steinbach, Nadja Züfle-Lemke, Dagmar-C Fischer, Manfred Ballmann

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06318208 (Pulmonary Function in Non-hospitalized Adults and Children After Mild COVID-19), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06318208 completednot on this map

Pulmonary Function in Non-hospitalized Adults and Children After Mild COVID-19

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of RostockRan2021 to 2022Enrolled110ConditionsSARS-CoV-2 InfectionArmslung function testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexandra R GörgesDepartment of Pediatrics, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
Philipp WarnkeInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Virology, and Hygiene, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
Micha LöbermannDepartment of Tropical Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Nephrology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Antonia ZapfInstitute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Julia WeitzelDepartment of Pediatrics, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
Maya-L SteinbachDepartment of Pediatrics, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
Nadja Züfle-LemkeDepartment of Pediatrics, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
Dagmar-C FischerDepartment of Pediatrics, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany.
Manfred BallmannDepartment of Pediatrics, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany. manfred.ballmann@med.uni-rostock.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the majority of patients suffering from COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) did not require hospitalization, data on the persistence of pulmonary sequelae after a mild SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory disease coronavirus 2) infection in patients without pre-existing respiratory diseases are virtually missing.

methodsPulmonary function (spirometry, diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and lung clearance index (LCI)) was assessed 4-12 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection in non-hospitalized patients aged 6-60 years. Acute and persisting COVID-19-related respiratory symptoms were ascertained, and the presence of other acute respiratory infection pathogens was checked via a multiplex-PCR approach from pharyngeal swabs. Participants with impaired lung function underwent a follow-up examination 3 months later. To complement the initial analysis, a retrospective z-score analysis of lung function parameters was conducted.

results110 patients (90 adults, 20 children) were included. In 45 adults (50%) and 17 children (85%), at least one pulmonary function test indicated an impaired lung function, particularly the LCI. Despite overall improvement between baseline and follow-up, 9 of 13 (69.2%) children and 35 of 42 (83.3%) adults with initial impairment still showed abnormal values about 5 months post SARS-CoV-2 infection. Specific respiratory symptoms were linked to lower spirometry and DLCO values. In 25 patients (40.3%) with abnormal lung function, and in 20 participants (43.5%) with normal pulmonary function, pathogens were detected at t

conclusionCritical pulmonary impairment after mild COVID-19 is rarely detected by spirometry and DLCO but may affect the LCI. Within 3 months, impaired pulmonary function improved in most patients. Children were less affected by severe pulmonary sequelae and respiratory complaints than adults. Complaints like dyspnoea or chest pain may be an early indicator of lung function impairment, suggesting that further diagnostic tests for treatable post-COVID-19 complications may be needed. Additionally, PCR-based screening for additional respiratory pathogens may help avoid misinterpretation of lung function results post SARS-CoV-2 infection.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT06318208) and German Clinical Trials Register (ID DRKS00030025).

Indexed as

COVID-19LungAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPulmonary Diffusing CapacityRespiratory Function TestsSpirometryYoung AdultLung clearance indexLung function testingMild COVID-19Pulmonary functionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID41199209
PMCPMC12593918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.