ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Effect of crisis resolution team treatment on crisis experience and crisis coping: a multicenter pre-post study in Norway.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCrisis resolution teams (CRTs) have been established in several high-income countries to improve access to mental health services and to prevent unnecessary inpatient admissions. General crisis theory is one of the foundations underpinning the development of CRTs. However, little research has been conducted on what characterises the situations leading to contact with these services and the crisis reactions during CRT care. This study aimed to describe characteristics and situations leading to contact with CRTs and to explore and predict possible changes in crisis experience and coping after CRT treatment.
methodsParticipants of this Norwegian multicentre pre-post study included 546 CRT service users of 25 CRTs. No control group was included. The present study builds on data collected from service users and team workers. The main outcome variables were change in patient-reported crisis experience and crisis coping from start to end of treatment. We performed descriptive analysis of affected life domains, and linear mixed modelling to analyse how outcomes were associated with patients' characteristics and treatment.
resultsAt treatment initiation, service users reported high scores of crisis experience and coping difficulties. Several life domains were affected, particularly emotional-life domains, such as mental illness, suicide risk, and loneliness. Lower levels of crisis experience, and enhanced coping abilities were observed within a timeframe of eight weeks or less. Although the current study design cannot rule out a specific causal relationship, recovery was nevertheless associated with service satisfaction, practical support, medication management, and quick access to help. Psychiatric symptoms at start, previous mental illness, and collaboration with wards were negatively related to a favourable outcome.
conclusionsCRT service users reported high levels of crisis experience and low levels of coping at treatment initiation. CRT treatment was associated with a decrease in severity and improvement in coping, although more severe mental health problems at the start were negatively related to recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.