ArticleCommunity dentistry and oral epidemiology2026
Refining Scale Measurement: Reassessing Oral Impacts on Daily Performances Properties With Item Response Theory.
Article in Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMany oral health-related quality of life instruments have been developed but few have undergone a comprehensive psychometric assessment. One commonly used measure is the Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP). This study revised the configural and metric properties as well as the performance of items based on Item Response Theory (IRT) of a dichotomous-item version of OIDP in Brazil.
methodsThe nine-item dichotomous version of the OIDP was analysed using data from a nationally representative sample from the Oral Health Survey (SBBrasil 2010). It consisted of 30 064 individuals aged 12 to 75 and was split into two partitions comprising n
resultsThe unidimensional model presented two violations of conditional independence, one between items i5 (practising sports) and i4 (going out) and another between items i6 (trouble in speaking) and i7 (shame of speaking or smiling). A CFA of the most parsimonious model (removing i5, i6 and i7) yielded a RMSEA = 0.02, WRMR = 1.42, CFI = 0.99 and TLI = 0.99. The IRT analyses showed that three pairs of items had very similar levels of difficulty and discrimination suggesting redundancy.
conclusionsA shorter dichotomous version of the OIDP scale has acceptable configural and metric properties. Being more concise and thus efficient, it may be better suited for large-scale population surveys than the version currently in use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.