ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2025
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) in Solid-State Characterization of Solid Dispersions: A Practical Guide.
Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reliable characterization of polymer electrolytes for next-generation energy storage: misinterpretations, challenges, and methodological solutions.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Mannitol as a Critical Excipient in Spray-Dried Chitosan Microspheres for Nasal Donepezil Delivery: Insights from Integrated Biomimetic Models.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- The Influence of the Ball Milling Process on the Structure and Functional Properties of Walnut Meal.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Myricetin Nanofibers as Amorphous Delivery System.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) is one of the most widely employed and rapid thermal analysis techniques for early-stage solid-state characterization, particularly in the development of solid dispersions. As an indirect method, DSC detects transitions in solid-state properties through heat flow measurements, providing valuable insights into crystallinity, polymorphism, and miscibility. However, the accuracy and interpretation of DSC thermograms are highly sensitive to various experimental parameters, including heating and cooling rates, sample preparation, moisture content, and the thermal history of the material. These variables can introduce artifacts or mask thermal events, leading to misinterpretation of solid-state transitions. This review critically examines key thermodynamic and kinetic factors reported in literature that influence DSC measurements in the context of solid dispersions. Emphasis is placed on the mechanisms by which these variables affect endothermic and exothermic transitions and how such influences can be mitigated through experimental design. Practical recommendations are provided to improve method reliability, including optimal scan rates, sample handling techniques, and the use of complementary analytical tools such as X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) to support DSC findings. The primary objective of this review is to serve as a technical guide for researchers and formulation scientists aiming to generate reproducible and interpretable DSC data for solid dispersion systems. By understanding the limitations and best practices associated with DSC, researchers can enhance the reliability of solid-state characterization and make informed decisions in formulation development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41199111What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.