ReviewMolecular and cellular biochemistry2026
Advancements in single-cell sequencing for cervical cancer research.
Review in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cellular Immunotherapy for Cervical Cancer: Next Therapeutics Frontiers.Oncology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell sequencing has revolutionized our understanding of cervical cancer (CC), revealing unprecedented cellular heterogeneity, tumor microenvironment (TME) dynamics, and molecular mechanisms underlying progression and therapy resistance. These technologies have identified distinct molecular subtypes (hypoxic, proliferative, and immunoreactive) and epithelial states (cytokeratin⁺, immune-interacting, and senescent), while uncovering HPV-driven oncogenic mechanisms, including viral integration hotspots (e.g., 8q24.21) and immune evasion strategies (e.g., SPP1⁺ TAMs and GALNT3-mediated immunosuppression). Metabolic reprogramming further stratifies tumors into spatially organized Warburg effect and OXPHOS-dominant niches, each associated with unique immune infiltration patterns. The TME exhibits a complex interplay between exhausted PD-1⁺LAG3⁺TIM3⁺ T cells, immunosuppressive stromal cells (MYH9⁺ CAFs, PODXL⁺ ECs), and rare but potent effector populations (FGFBP2⁺ NK cells, CXCL13⁺ TRMs). Despite these advances, clinical translation faces challenges, including resistance mechanisms (NFKB1 mutations, BCL10⁺ Treg suppression) and a lack of inhibitors for key targets (PCLAF⁺ TAEpis, MYH9⁺ CAFs). Promising therapeutic strategies include epigenetic modulation (SALL4), sialylation inhibition (GALNT3/12), and immune-stromal co-targeting (PD-1 + LAG3/TIM3, NRG1-ERBB3 blockade). Future efforts must prioritize functional validation of novel targets (DKK2, ELF3), spatial multi-omics to resolve CAF-immune-metabolic crosstalk, and biomarker-driven clinical trials integrating single-cell classifiers. By bridging single-cell insights with mechanistic and translational studies, the field can overcome stromal-mediated resistance and usher in an era of precision immunotherapy for CC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.