Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199104›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2025

History of cold urticaria research: from systematic studies of the 19th century to modern prospective strategies in clinical practice.

Maria Zofia Lisiecka

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maria Zofia LisieckaDepartment of Allergology, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland. mariazofialisiecka@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the current prospective strategies for diagnosing and treating cold urticaria based on the history of its research since the 19th century. The study analysed relevant scientific sources, and the main historical milestones of cold urticaria research were identified. Based on the results, a chronology of scientific events was established that formed the modern understanding of the pathogenesis of cold urticaria and contributed to the development of diagnostic and treatment methods used in contemporary clinical practice. Throughout the 19th century, scientists formulated the concept of cold urticaria as an allergic reaction, identifying a causal relationship between exposure to cold and a patient's skin reaction. They expanded this understanding by describing the symptoms, triggers, and mechanism of development, and establishing the hereditary nature of the disease. The technological capabilities of the 20th century significantly improved the level of research. The results obtained have demonstrated the scientific processes that have become the basis for the introduction of existing approaches to the treatment of cold urticaria and have expanded the potential for the development of fundamentally new therapeutic strategies in this area.

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureUrticariaBiomedical ResearchCold UrticariaHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansAllergic reactionCorticosteroidsHistamineImmunotherapyPersonalised treatmentSkin prick test method

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.