ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025
Navigating digital behavior change: a mixed-method examining the expert perspectives for cancer survivors.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWith the dramatic increase in the number of people with cancer, it is necessary to optimize new interventions that promote a healthy lifestyle. This study aimed to explore medical experts' experiences and perspectives regarding the acceptability and feasibility of digital behavior change interventions for Iranian cancer survivors, as well as to identify their potential benefits and barriers.
methodsWe employed a mixed-methods design to capture both the breadth and depth of clinical experts' perspectives on a digital lifestyle application for cancer survivors and to facilitate triangulation. In the quantitative phase, a standardized questionnaire was administered to 30 professionals, comprising both medical and psychology experts with extensive experience working with cancer survivors. To complement these findings, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a subset of 23 experts.
resultsQuantitative analysis revealed that only a small proportion of participants had access to their patients outside of clinical visits. Nevertheless, participants broadly agreed on the feasibility of implementing digital behavior change interventions to support healthy lifestyle changes. Concerns were minimal, provided that such interventions deliver evidence-based information, integrate patient feedback, and maintain strict confidentiality. Complementary thematic analysis further highlighted digital interventions as promising tools for improving lifestyle behaviors among cancer survivors. Essential features for an effective intervention included user-friendliness, simple language, motivational and supportive design, trustworthiness, and cultural adaptability.
conclusionOur findings indicate that digital behavior change interventions are generally acceptable to Iranian medical experts, provided that potential enablers are leveraged and barriers are addressed to maximize their use. Implications for cancer survivors This study highlights the potential of digital behavior change applications to support cancer survivors in adopting and maintaining healthier lifestyles, particularly in underrepresented settings such as Iran. It also provides insight into key features to improve its acceptance, beside addressing potential barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41199012What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.