Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199007›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2026

Willingness to work for sucrose: Impact of schedules, reinforcer alternatives, homeostatic value, and individual differences in male mice.

Edgar Arias-Sandoval, Carla Carratalá-Ros, Paula Matas-Navarro, John D Salamone, Mercè Correa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edgar Arias-SandovalÀrea de Psicobiologia, Universitat Jaume I, Campus de Riu Sec, Castelló, 12071, Spain.
Carla Carratalá-RosÀrea de Psicobiologia, Universitat Jaume I, Campus de Riu Sec, Castelló, 12071, Spain.
Paula Matas-NavarroÀrea de Psicobiologia, Universitat Jaume I, Campus de Riu Sec, Castelló, 12071, Spain.
John D SalamoneDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Behavioral Neuroscience Program, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269-1020, USA.
Mercè CorreaÀrea de Psicobiologia, Universitat Jaume I, Campus de Riu Sec, Castelló, 12071, Spain. correa@uji.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9868-3131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivated behavior is characterized by a high degree of behavioral activation and effort. Preclinical models of operant effort-based decision-making are useful for studying motivational symptoms seen in many psychopathologies as well as observing individual vulnerability. In this study, we evaluated the impact of having alternative reward choices with different effort demands on the decision-making process that may lead to individual differences in working. Adult CD1 male mice, trained on a fixed ratio (FR) 8, were divided into two groups: the no-choice (FR8 for 10% sucrose) and choice (FR8 for 10% sucrose plus concurrent free access to 3% sucrose) conditions. After 5 weeks, a progressive ratio (PROG) schedule was introduced under the same choice conditions. Results indicate that only the no-choice group adjusted their work-output after changing from FR8 to PROG. The choice group did not increase lever pressing when PROG was introduced, but it maintained total fluid intake (10% plus 3%). Water restriction increased intake of all fluids in both choice conditions, independently of the effort required. Additionally, a median split based on PROG performance was used to compare high and low performers. Individual differences in lever pressing were seen under both choice conditions, but only high-performers significantly increased work output when PROG was introduced. Among the choice group, high-PROG performers did not increase total volume obtained compared with low-performers. Thus, the choice condition induced individual differences based mostly on willingness to work rather than to obtain the maximum amount of reinforcer. Further studies in both sexes should characterize this "high-worker" profile.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorConditioning, OperantHomeostasisIndividualityMotivationReinforcement, PsychologyReinforcement ScheduleSucroseAnimalsMaleMiceRewardSucroseDecision-makingEffortMiceOperantSucrose consumption

Identifiers

PMID41199007
PMCPMC13194295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.