ArticleCommunications chemistry2025
Refining EI-MS library search results through atomic-level insights.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The inherent complexity of mass spectra and the lack of direct correlation between spectral and structural similarities retards structure elucidation and accurate peak annotation. Our methodology employs modified atomic environments from topological radii zero to represent collections of annotated spectral peaks. Rather than aiming for de novo structure prediction from spectra, our objective is to refine and re-rank candidate structures retrieved by existing library search methods using predicted atom environments. We conducted a multi-step complexity reduction to mass-to-fragment mappings and trained the Transformer model to predict the atomic environments of compounds directly from mass and intensity data, achieving a peak precision of 86.1% and a recall rate of 78.4% on the test set. This novel framework not only aids in interpreting EI-MS data by providing insights into structural contents but also refines cosine similarity rankings by suggesting the inclusion or exclusion of certain atomic environments. Our findings over the NIST database suggest that our approach complements conventional methods by improving spectra matching through an in-depth atomic-level analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.