Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41198916›Full record

Trial reportDiabetologia2026

Effectiveness of video consultations in type 1 diabetes patients treated with insulin pumps in the outpatient clinic: a randomised controlled trial.

Anders N Ø Schultz, Robin Christensen, Georg Bollig, Kristian Kidholm, Frans Brandt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04612933 (Effectiveness of Video Consultations in Type 1 Diabetes Patients Treated With Insulin Pumps in the Outpatient Clinic), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04612933 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Video Consultations in Type 1 Diabetes Patients Treated With Insulin Pumps in the Outpatient Clinic

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern DenmarkRan2021 to 2024Enrolled76ConditionsTelemedicine, Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus 1ArmsIntervention group video consultations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anders N Ø SchultzDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark. Anos@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1908-6428
Robin ChristensenResearch Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6600-0631
Georg BolligDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Palliative Medicine and Pain Therapy, HELIOS Klinikum, Schleswig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-5295
Kristian KidholmCentre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1037-6514
Frans BrandtDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4381-9193

Funding

Knud og Edith Eriksens Mindefond grant number 62786-2020Oak Foundation OFIL-24-074Region Syddanmark grant number A419Sygehus Sønderjylland No grant number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisThe aim of this work was to assess the effect of video consultations over 1 year compared with usual care for patients with type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pumps, with time in range (TiR) as the primary outcome measure.

methodsWe carried out a 52 week, open label, randomised, controlled superiority trial including adult type 1 diabetes patients treated with insulin pumps. Participants were recruited from the Hospital of Southern Jutland and were adult patients, diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus who had used an insulin pump for at least 6 months. Participants were randomised to video consultations (intervention) or physical consultations (control) using a computer-generated block randomisation sequence in a 1:1 allocation, stratified for sensor type (continuous glucose monitor and flash glucose monitor, respectively).Since this was an 'open-label' trial, neither the healthcare professionals providing the treatment nor the participants were blinded to allocation after randomisation. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of TiR (glucose levels 3.9-10.0 mmol/l) from week 51 to 52, measured by continuous glucose monitoring. Continuous endpoints were analysed using ANCOVA, with randomised treatment and stratification groups as fixed effects and the baseline value as a covariate. Missing data in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population were addressed using multiple imputation.

resultsOf the 76 randomised participants (ITT population, 38 per group, median age 49 years, 51% women), 32 participants in the intervention group and 31 in the control group completed the study. Least square means TiR at 1 year was 64.3% in the video group and 63.5% in the control group, with a clinically insignificant difference of 0.8 percentage points (95% CI -5.3, 6.9; p=0.25). For secondary outcomes, the video group was superior in terms of treatment satisfaction and reduction in HbA CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationVideo consultations did not significantly improve the primary endpoint. However, compared with control, the intervention was associated with superior treatment satisfaction and a favourable effect on HbA

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04612933

fundingThe study received funding from Knud and Edith Eriksens Mindefond. The Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital is supported by a core grant from the Oak Foundation.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1InsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinDiabetes mellitusInsulin pumpsRandomised controlled trialTelemedicineVideo consultations

Identifiers

PMID41198916
PMCPMC12779728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.