Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41198914›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

A Bayesian-driven approach to identify racial inequities in longitudinal care delivery.

Aidan M Campbell, A James O'Malley, Inas S Khayal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aidan M CampbellThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA.
A James O'MalleyThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Inas S KhayalThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. inas.khayal@wayne.edu.

Funding

American Cancer Society,United States RSG-22-128-01- HOPS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measures of healthcare quality and equity often overlook when care is delivered, potentially masking important disparities. We present a novel, time-aware approach to detect racial inequities in hospice use among 100,480 Medicare beneficiaries with advanced cancer. Tracking hospice initiation over the final 200 days of life, we introduce a daily "difference signal" that shows how utilization patterns change over time. Using a Bayesian framework to quantify uncertainty and applying clinically meaningful thresholds, we pinpoint when disparities arise and how large they are. Compared to a conventional, time-agnostic benchmark, our approach reveals substantial day-level disparities that aggregate measures can miss. Notably, while overall measures often show greater hospice access for white patients, our temporal analysis frequently found earlier hospice use by patients of color, demonstrating how timing can reverse apparent patterns. By identifying when disparities emerge, our method offers more actionable targets for interventions and future digital health equity efforts.

Identifiers

PMID41198914
PMCPMC12592331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.