ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2025
Optimizing lazertinib therapy through GSTM1 genotyping: a strategy to reduce excess drug exposure and potential toxicity.
Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe combination of lazertinib and amivantamab has shown superior efficacy over first line osimertinib in EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, but is associated with significant toxicity and high costs. Lazertinib exposure varies widely due to genetic polymorphisms of the encoding for GSTM1, with almost 50% of Caucasians having a non-functional enzyme resulting in an approximate twofold higher systemic drug exposure. Despite this, all patients receive a fixed 240 mg once-daily dose irrespective of GSTM1 status, leading to avoidable toxicity without additional clinical benefit. Our purpose was to develop alternative dosing regimens based on GSTM1 status.
methodsWe conducted pharmacokinetic simulations using an existing validated population pharmacokinetic model to evaluate genotype-guided alternative dosing strategies in GSTM1 null individuals.
resultsTwo regimens- 160 mg once daily (QD) and 240 mg every other day-were predicted to provide systemic exposures comparable to or exceeding those seen in GSTM1 non-null patients on the standard dose. The 160 mg QD dose resulted in a geometric mean ratio in GSTM1 null patients (GMR) for the trough (Ctrough) and average (Caverage) concentration relative tot he approved dose in GSTM1 non-null patients of 1.43 and 1.19, respectively. The respective GMRs for Ctrough and Caverage associated with 240 mg every-other-day dosing were 0.90 and 0.89, and this dosing regimen could reduce drug expenses up to 50% ($132.860 per year per patient) based on current pricing.
conclusionOur findings support the feasibility of individualized lazertinib dosing based on GSTM1 status to reduce toxicity and healthcare costs without compromising effective exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.