Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41198911›Full record

ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2025

Optimizing lazertinib therapy through GSTM1 genotyping: a strategy to reduce excess drug exposure and potential toxicity.

Rob Ter Heine, Bianca J C van den Bosch, Robin M van Geel, Wouter H van Geffen, Lizza E L Hendriks, Michel M van den Heuvel, Simon E Koele, Adrianus J de Langen, Thijs H Oude Munnink, Anthonie J van der Wekken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rob Ter HeineDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmacology & Toxicology Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. r.terheine@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2185-8201
Bianca J C van den BoschDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Clinical Genomics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Robin M van GeelDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Wouter H van GeffenDepartment of Pulmonology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lizza E L HendriksDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Michel M van den HeuvelDepartment of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Simon E KoeleDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmacology & Toxicology Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Adrianus J de LangenDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thijs H Oude MunninkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anthonie J van der WekkenDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe combination of lazertinib and amivantamab has shown superior efficacy over first line osimertinib in EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, but is associated with significant toxicity and high costs. Lazertinib exposure varies widely due to genetic polymorphisms of the encoding for GSTM1, with almost 50% of Caucasians having a non-functional enzyme resulting in an approximate twofold higher systemic drug exposure. Despite this, all patients receive a fixed 240 mg once-daily dose irrespective of GSTM1 status, leading to avoidable toxicity without additional clinical benefit. Our purpose was to develop alternative dosing regimens based on GSTM1 status.

methodsWe conducted pharmacokinetic simulations using an existing validated population pharmacokinetic model to evaluate genotype-guided alternative dosing strategies in GSTM1 null individuals.

resultsTwo regimens- 160 mg once daily (QD) and 240 mg every other day-were predicted to provide systemic exposures comparable to or exceeding those seen in GSTM1 non-null patients on the standard dose. The 160 mg QD dose resulted in a geometric mean ratio in GSTM1 null patients (GMR) for the trough (Ctrough) and average (Caverage) concentration relative tot he approved dose in GSTM1 non-null patients of 1.43 and 1.19, respectively. The respective GMRs for Ctrough and Caverage associated with 240 mg every-other-day dosing were 0.90 and 0.89, and this dosing regimen could reduce drug expenses up to 50% ($132.860 per year per patient) based on current pricing.

conclusionOur findings support the feasibility of individualized lazertinib dosing based on GSTM1 status to reduce toxicity and healthcare costs without compromising effective exposure.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungGlutathione TransferaseLung NeoplasmsAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugErbB ReceptorsGenotypeHumansIndolesModels, BiologicalPolymorphism, GeneticPyrimidinesQuinolinesAcrylamidesAniline CompoundsErbB ReceptorsGlutathione TransferaseIndolesosimertinibPyrimidinesQuinolinesDose individualizationEGFRLazertinibPharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID41198911
PMCPMC12592258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.