Trial reportClinical oral investigations2025
Effects of chlorhexidine and a polyherbal mouthwash on the oral microbiome and user satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metagenome and Metabolic Pathways in Plaque Biofilms of Thai ELANE-Associated Neutropenic Patients: An Original Study and Scoping Review.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Chlorhexidine Derivatives and Alternative Agents on Streptococcus mutans Viability, Biofilm Formation, and Gene Expression.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Article
- Delayed shifts in salivary microbiota composition following long-term use of 0.06% chlorhexidine toothpaste.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to comparatively evaluate the effects of polyherbal, chlorhexidine (CHX), and normal saline (NCC) mouthwashes on oral microbiome composition, microbial metabolic pathways, and patient-reported outcomes, with the goal of assessing the potential of polyherbal mouthwash as a natural alternative to CHX for managing gingivitis, while aiming to minimize CHX-associated microbial dysbiosis.
methodsA randomized, double-blind trial was conducted among 27 patients with gingivitis, randomly assigned to polyherbal, CHX, or NCC mouthwash groups. Participants used the assigned mouthwash twice daily for 7 days. Saliva samples were analyzed via 16 S rRNA sequencing to assess microbial diversity (alpha and beta) and taxonomic composition. Differential taxa and pathways were identified using FDR-corrected Wilcoxon tests and log₂ fold-change analysis. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using numerical rating scales (NRS).
resultsThe polyherbal mouthwash demonstrated significantly higher patient acceptability than CHX and NCC, with superior scores in taste, smell, texture, moisture retention, overall satisfaction, and willingness for continued use (p < 0.05). While CHX exhibited strong antimicrobial activity, its alcohol-containing formulation markedly disrupted microbial diversity, increased potentially dysbiotic genera (Streptococcus, Porphyromonas), and altered 23 metabolic pathways associated with dysbiosis. In contrast, the polyherbal mouthwash-which also contained cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC)- selectively increased beneficial genera (Amnipila, Absconditabacteriales [SR1], Peptostreptococcus), preserved overall microbial diversity, and modulated only two pathways, notably upregulating L-isoleucine biosynthesis.
conclusionThe polyherbal mouthwash represents a promising alternative to CHX, demonstrating selective microbial modulation, preservation of microbiome stability, and enhanced patient acceptability. These findings support its potential integration into routine oral healthcare as a microbiome-friendly and patient-acceptable solution. Further studies are warranted to evaluate CPC-free polyherbal formulations across larger and more diverse populations over extended durations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41198897What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.