ArticleScientific reports2025
Nonlinear degradation modeling and remaining useful life prediction for electric drive system with multiple failure modes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate modeling of performance degradation and dynamic prediction of remaining useful life (RUL) for electric driving system (EDS) with multiple failure modes are critical for reliability assessment and health management. This study presents an integrated framework that encompasses composite health indicator construction, nonlinear degradation modeling, and RUL prediction. The entropy weight method is used to integrate the damage contributions of different components under various failure modes, resulting in a composite health indicator for the EDS. A nonlinear degradation model construction method for the EDS is presented, with failure thresholds and inherent uncertainties determined through actual bench testing over the full life cycle. The model is further refined by incorporating the acceleration factor between the accelerated and user spectra. Additionally, a Bayesian parameter update method is proposed for RUL prediction and uncertainty quantification, users with varying degradation rates across different service cycles are analyzed. The case study demonstrates that after approximately 20% of the service life, the proposed method achieves prediction errors within 10%. As historical data accumulates, model parameter estimates stabilize, and the predicted RUL probability distribution becomes increasingly concentrated. Comparative experiments against Wiener and CNN-LSTM models further demonstrate the superior robustness and accuracy of the proposed method. This study provides specific references and technical support for the reliability assessment and intelligent operation and maintenance of complex systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.