ArticleCommunications biology2025
The influence of environment on bacterial co-abundance in the gut microbiomes of healthy human individuals.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gut microbiome is a complex ecosystem characterized not only by its marginal taxonomic composition but also by its emergent properties. Bacteria develop local interactions to form coherent functional communities, whose effects on health and diseases cannot be predicted from the behavior of individual members. Understanding the factors underlying variability in these communities may therefore provide critical insights on the biological links between the gut microbiome and human phenotypes. Here, we examined the effect of a range of host factors, including demographics, medical history, and dietary habits, on these communities in 938 healthy individuals using MANOCCA, a covariance-based approach developed to address existing limitations. Increased age and smoking were associated with a significant overall decrease in co-abundance, and conversely a higher body mass index was associated with increased co-abundance. At the taxon level, a core of 200 genera were systematically impacted in their co-abundance with other taxa, suggesting a central role in structuring the network. Finally, we demonstrate that our approach offers a powerful framework for prediction purposes, with taxa co-abundance being able to predict the age of participants with an accuracy three-fold higher than a model based on abundance only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.