Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41198863›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Predicting carotid in-stent restenosis with dual-energy CT: a multicenter study.

Weiming Hu, Guihan Lin, Weiyue Chen, Ting Zhao, Zhuohang Shi, Cheng Ma, Zhanning Hu, Lei Xu, Xusheng Qian, Zhihan Yan and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Weiming Hu *Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China.
Guihan Lin *Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China.
Weiyue ChenZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China.
Ting ZhaoZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China.
Zhuohang ShiZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China.
Cheng MaZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China.
Zhanning HuZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China.
Lei XuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xusheng QianSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Zhihan YanDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Shuiwei XiaZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China.
Chenying LuZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China.
Minjiang ChenZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China.
Weiqian ChenZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China. ls2119088@126.com.
Jiansong JiZhejiang Key Laboratory of Imaging and Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Interventional Medicine Engineering and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine of Lishui City, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China. jjstcty@wmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-620X

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province LBZ24H100001Zhejiang Medicine and Health science and Technology Project 2025KY1964Zhejiang Medicine and Health science and Technology Project 2025KY493Zhejiang Medicine and Health science and Technology Project 2025KY495Zhejiang Medicine and Health science and Technology Project 2025KY497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur work aimed to assess the clinical value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) parameters in predicting in-stent restenosis (ISR) after carotid artery stenting (CAS) and to develop a nomogram model incorporating these parameters to enhance the accuracy of ISR risk prediction. MATERIALS AND

methodsOur retrospective multicenter research enrolled 205 patients who underwent CAS from January 2018 to April 2023, with DECT scans performed prior to the procedure. Two radiologists independently measured the DECT parameters and evaluated the characteristics of carotid plaques. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of ISR. Three models were developed: clinical model, DECT model, and nomogram model. These models were assessed based on the area under the curve (AUC) and calibration, with their clinical value assessed utilizing decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsAmong 205 patients, 35 in the training set and 15 in the validation set experienced ISR. Multivariate analysis identified plaque length, fat fraction, normalized iodine concentration, and effective atomic number as independent predictors of ISR. Nomogram model, combining clinical and DECT parameters, demonstrated high accuracy in predicting ISR, with 0.931 (95% CI: 0.878-0.966) AUC in the training set and 0.872 (95% CI: 0.754-0.947) in the validation set, exceeding both clinical (AUC: 0.797, 0.673) and DECT models (AUC: 0.880, 0.853). Calibration curve and DCA exhibited the nomogram's excellent performance and clinical utility.

conclusionThe nomogram model integrating DECT parameters and clinical predictors provides a reliable and noninvasive tool for predicting ISR risk following CAS. It facilitates the formulation of individualized treatment strategies and offers important references for early intervention. KEY POINTS: Question Preoperative prediction of in-stent restenosis (ISR) risk after carotid artery stenting is critical for optimizing revascularization strategies, yet current assessment methods remain limited and subjective. Findings The nomogram incorporating plaque length, fat fraction, normalized iodine, and effective atomic number for predicting ISR risk achieved AUCs of 0.931 and 0.872 in the training and validation sets. Clinical relevance This nomogram can serve as an effective tool for predicting ISR risk to guide personalized treatment, potentially reducing ISR-related strokes and improving carotid stenting outcomes.

Indexed as

Carotid StenosisRadiography, Dual-Energy Scanned ProjectionStentsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesCarotid stenosisStentsTomography (x-ray computed)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.