Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41198862›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

What imitating an iconic robot reveals on allospecific vocal imitation in parrots and starlings.

Nick C P Dam, Henkjan Honing, Michelle J Spierings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nick C P DamInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, PO Box 9505, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands. birdsingalong@gmail.com.
Henkjan HoningMusic Cognition Group, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94242, 1090 GE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michelle J SpieringsInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, PO Box 9505, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

FWF YIRG 10.55776/ZK66NWO XS 406.XS.03.074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vocal production learning is a remarkable ability, exclusively present in a few mammalian species and three bird clades. Besides learning conspecific vocalizations, vocal production can also lead to integration of allospecific sounds in an animal's repertoire. While parrots and songbirds are well known for their allospecific imitation abilities, structural differences in imitation accuracy across species remain unclear. This study compared nine parrot species and European starlings on their ability to imitate monophonic and multiphonic sounds created for the Star Wars character R2-D2. These complex synthesizer sounds allow for a strong comparative analysis with the same spectral complexity imitated by multiple species. Our results show that starlings have a higher accuracy when imitating multiphonic sounds than parrots. However, both groups performed equally well when imitating monophonic sounds. Differences in imitation accuracy likely stem from syrinx anatomy rather than perceptual or cognitive disparities. Among parrots, species with smaller brains, such as budgerigars and cockatiels, outperformed larger-brained African greys and amazon parrots in monophonic sound imitation. Our study highlights the great potential of citizen science for expanding data collection beyond traditional studies and sheds light on the evolution of communication complexity in vocal learners.

Indexed as

Imitative BehaviorParrotsRoboticsStarlingsVocalization, AnimalAnimalsLearningAllospecific imitationBiphonationCitizen scienceComparative studiesMultiphonic and monophonic soundsVocal learning

Identifiers

PMID41198862
PMCPMC12592491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.