Trial reportScientific reports2025
Comparison between transmural puncture combined with sensor tube technique with direct puncture in invasive blood pressure monitoring: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study primarily aimed to compare the efficacy of the transmural puncture combined with sensor tube technique and the direct puncture technique by examining the success of radial artery cannulation performed by nurses. The study was a prospective randomized controlled study. A total of 8 neurocritical nurses performed radial arterial insertion for 91 patients using both the transmural puncture combined with sensor tube technique and the direct puncture technique in random order. The primary outcome was successful cannulation of the radial artery in 3 or less attempts. Other collected data included the total number of attempts, total time for catheter cannulation, and occurrence of complications. In comparison with the direct puncture technique, transmural puncture combined with sensor tube increased the probability of successful initial catheterization (OR 3.27, [95% CI: 1.292-8.299]; P = 0.012) and demonstrated less blood exposure (6.52% vs. 80.0%, P < 0.001, φ=-0.742). A combination of transmural puncture and a sensor tube resulted in fewer cases of extubation due to complications. Furthermore, immediate complications caused by puncture (4.34% vs. 17.78%; P = 0.039, φ=-0.215) and extubation due to complications were reduced (47.8% vs. 71.1%, P = 0.024, φ = 0.237). Transmural puncture combined with sensor tube was demonstrated to increase the success rate of the initial arterial puncture, reduce blood exposure and reduce the occurrence of complications. Therefore, the transmural puncture combined with sensor tube technique may be an acceptable option for cannulation of the radial artery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.