ArticleScientific reports2025
Rhizospheric microbiomes differ between dormant and active Potaninia mongolica in the Gobi desert of Mongolia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rhizospheric microbiomes differ between active and dormant plants due to changes in root activity and exudate production, especially under environmental stress. In arid regions, native plants such as Potaninia mongolica Maxim enter dormancy to survive harsh conditions. However, rhizospheric microbial and chemical differences between active and dormant states of plants remain poorly described. This study investigated rhizospheric microbial communities and soil chemical changes in the case of active and dormant P.mongolica plants. Rhizospheric soil samples were collected, and soil texture and chemical variables were analyzed. High-throughput sequencing targeting the 16S rRNA and ITS regions was conducted to profile bacterial and fungal communities, respectively. Results showed that the dominant fungal phyla were Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, while Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were the dominant bacterial phyla in both plant states. Although bacterial diversity did not differ significantly between active and dormant plants (p > 0.05, Welch's t-test), fungal diversity was significantly different. Among soil chemical variables, total nitrogen was notably elevated in the rhizosphere of dormant plants (mean = 7.93; SD = 5.91). These findings reveal differences in fungal community structure and nitrogen levels in the rhizosphere between active and dormant plant states. Understanding these interactions contributes to our knowledge of desert plant microbiome dynamics and may inform the use of microbial indicators or amendments to support vegetation restoration in arid environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.