Observational studyScientific reports2025
Reassessing chest compression sites in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation without ventilatory support using echocardiographic assessment: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recommended chest compression site during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is based on studies that did not account for dynamic respiratory changes in cardiac position. Since cardiac position changes with respiratory phase, the optimal site during CPR without respiratory support, which physiologically corresponds to the end-expiration state, may differ. We assessed heart position at end-expiration using echocardiography. A prospective observational study was conducted in 18 children under 7 years of age. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed to identify the position of the left ventricle during both inspiration and expiration. Each subject underwent five measurements in each respiratory phase. The position of the left ventricle was recorded relative to the inter-nipple line and categorized by intercostal space (ICS). At end-expiration, the left ventricle was commonly located at the first upper ICS (53.3%) and nipple line (27.8%), with only 4.4% located at the first lower ICS and none below that level. During inspiration, the left ventricle was located at the first lower ICS (50.0%) and nipple line (35.6%). Linear mixed-effects regression demonstrated a significant upward shift in heart position during expiration compared to inspiration (β = -1.46; 95% CI, -1.91 to -1.00; p < 0.001), independent of age, sex, and weight. These findings confirm that respiratory phase affects heart position in young children, with expiration associated with consistent cephalad shift. Therefore, the optimal chest compression site during pediatric CPR without respiratory support may be more cephalad than current guideline recommendations, suggesting the need to re-evaluate traditional landmarks in light of physiologic cardiac motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.