ArticleScientific reports2025
Mechanical performance of 3D-printed and milled resins for pediatric provisional restorations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From polyetheretherketone to 3D‑printed composites: hydrothermal stability and cement‑dependent resin bonding of high‑performance polymers to pediatric restorations.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing in Dentistry: Evolution, Technologies, and Clinical Application.Polymers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given the growth-related challenges in pediatric and adolescent patients and the increasing adoption of digital workflows, durable yet adaptable materials are needed for provisional restorations. This study evaluated the mechanical performance of two 3D-printed resins, Graphy TC-80DP (GP) and NextDent C&B MFH (ND), and a milled nano-hybrid resin, Mazic Duro (MD). A multidimensional assessment was conducted, including fracture resistance, flexural strength, flexural modulus, viscoelasticity, and polymerization behavior. ND showed the highest fracture resistance, MD exhibited superior flexural strength and flexural modulus, and GP demonstrated faster polymerization and greater thermal stability. These findings suggest that both 3D-printed and milled resins are clinically viable for pediatric provisional restorations, with material selection depending on occlusal load, patient age, and functional demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.