Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41198800›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development and pilot testing of a needs assessment scale for awake patients with tracheal intubation.

Mengzhen Liu, Zewen Pan, Jianhua Tang, Zhongjun Cao, Mengting Yin, Hongling Zheng, Jiao Li, Xin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mengzhen Liu *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Zewen Pan *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Jianhua TangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Zhongjun CaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Mengting YinDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Hongling ZhengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Jiao LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Xin LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. liuxin@scszlyy.org.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Awake intensive care unit (ICU) patients with endotracheal intubation are exposed to various physiological and psychological stressors due to their medical conditions. As they are unable to communicate verbally, these patients usually struggle to accurately express their needs, which can exacerbate their discomfort and hinder recovery. Our study aimed to develop a needs assessment tool specifically for patients who are awake while intubated to help identify unmet needs promptly. A preliminary needs assessment scale for awake and intubated patients was developed through a systematic literature review and panelist meetings. The scale was refined using two rounds of the Delphi method. A total of 17 and 16 experts participated in two rounds of expert consultation, respectively, during which we gathered their opinions and refined the indicators through a comprehensive literature review and expert panel meetings. This process culminated in developing a needs assessment scale comprising five primary dimensions and 37 secondary items. Subsequently, we conducted a pilot test involving 30 participants, and the results indicated that patients could accurately comprehend each item and independently complete the scale within approximately 10 min. The needs assessment scale developed in this study provides an accurate tool for assessing the needs of awake and intubated ICU patients, demonstrating strong scientific validity and feasibility, thereby providing healthcare professionals with guidance for implementing individualized interventions. Additional research is needed for multi-center, large-sample clinical validation.

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealNeeds AssessmentWakefulnessAdultAgedDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsAwakeDelphi methodEndotracheal intubationNeeds assessment

Identifiers

PMID41198800
PMCPMC12592551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.