ArticleScientific reports2025
An interpretable statistical approach to photovoltaic power forecasting using factor analysis and ridge regression.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid analysis of photovoltaic energy data containing excessive structural zeros.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate forecasting of solar energy is essential for balancing supply and demand, enhancing energy planning, and supporting the integration of renewable resources into modern electricity grids. While recent research has heavily focused on machine learning-based models such as Long Short-Term Memory networks for solar energy forecasting, these approaches often lack transparency and interpretability. This study presents an interpretable by design photovoltaic (PV) forecasting framework that couples hierarchical factor analysis (HFA) with ridge regression. HFA compresses high dimensional meteorology into three physics meaningful second order factors after which a single parameter ridge model provides coefficient level transparency and regularization in this compact space. Using 15 min measurements from a 93.6 kWp plant in Adıyaman, Türkiye (May 17, 2021-Jan 12, 2025), we evaluate under a unified chronological split (0.64/0.16/0.20). The model combines strong generalization with clear insights into how meteorological variables affect solar power generation, ensuring transparency and verifiability. These results highlight regression-based methods as robust, explainable alternatives to complex deep learning models in photovoltaic forecasting.Since development and forecasting using highly multivariate models is typically not an easy task, our approach is designed to provide a more streamlined model through which future prediction is easier. Simplifying complexity and making it easier to understand how parameters affect the result, our proposed model simplifies finding the most important drivers of solar power generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.