ArticleScientific reports2025
A two-stage architecture for soundscape classification and preservation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structure-aware acoustic scene classification: a feature decoupling framework using HPSS and asymmetric convolutions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sound classification is a fundamental task in audio signal processing with applications ranging from environmental monitoring to urban planning. We present a novel two-stage system for open set audio classification that integrates deep learning techniques with Schafer's soundscape theory. The two-stage architecture consists of: (1) a variational autoencoder (VAE) that first learns compressed representations of acoustic features and identifies distinctive sounds through reconstruction error analysis, and (2) a convolutional neural network (CNN) that then classifies these sounds into Schafer's theoretical categories (keynotes, sound signals, and soundmarks) using the learned features. This sequential approach allows the system to first understand what makes sounds unique before categorizing their role in the soundscape. The VAE effectively learns the latent representation of acoustic features from mel-spectrograms, while the CNN leverages these representations for classification. We evaluated the system on standard datasets including UrbanSound8K, ESC-50, URBAN-SED, and TUT urban acoustic scenes, achieving an average accuracy of 80.7% across all datasets. Additionally, we tested our approach on a dataset composed of binaural recordings collected in the university neighborhood of Pescara, Italy. Our research provides empirical validation of Schafer's theoretical framework through quantitative metrics, demonstrating strong alignment between computational classifications and theoretical descriptions. The proposed methodology advances soundscape analysis by objectively quantifying previously qualitative categories, enabling automated classification while maintaining theoretical fidelity, and creating a foundation for soundscape preservation policies that protect acoustic identity as a form of intangible cultural heritage.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.