ArticleScientific reports2025
Older adult frontal plane balance during 90 degree turns while walking.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined how older adults regulated their balance during turns relevant to everyday mobility, towards informing future fall-risk mitigation approaches. Sixteen healthy older adults participated in this study. Balance biomechanics were quantified using whole-body optical motion capture. Three tasks were performed 10-14 times: straight line gait, 90˚ pre-planned left turns, and 90˚ late-cued left turns that were cued visually. Frontal plane angular momentum ranges and the minimum horizontal distance between the center of mass and lateral edge of the base of support (lateral distance) were compared across tasks using linear mixed models. Lateral distance minima were larger during straight-line gait than either turning task, and larger during late-cued than pre-planned turns. Group-level analysis showed that frontal plane angular momentum ranges were smaller during straight-line gait than during either turn task. Participant-specific analyses revealed that not all participants followed the group-level statistical findings for angular momentum, with some demonstrating the opposite behavior. To explore these diverse balance behaviors, preliminary explorations found significant associations between balance state extrema and baseline assessment scores (e.g., greater concern about falling was associated with smaller angular momentum ranges). Additionally, this study prompts more thoughtful interpretations of balance biomechanics when attempting to characterize an individual's fall-risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.