ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning for sports motion recognition with a high-precision framework for performance enhancement.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multimodal deep learning-based model for posture asymmetry recognition and sports injury risk prediction in adolescent table tennis athletes.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sports motion recognition is essential for performance analysis, injury prevention, and athlete monitoring. Traditional deep learning models, such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Transformer-based architectures, struggle to capture motion dynamics with long-term dependencies or noise in their inputs. To overcome these limitations, this work proposes an Evolved Parallel Recurrent Network (EPRN) with wavelet transforms for high-precision motion recognition. The EPRN framework utilizes parallel recurrent pathways to enhance temporal modeling, while wavelet-based feature extraction preserves the fine-grained details of motion at multiple spatial and temporal resolutions. The proposed method has been tested on benchmark sports motion data and compared with several common architectures, including LSTM, Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models. The experiments demonstrated that EPRN outperforms the other models, reducing the root mean squared error (RMSE) by 23.5% and increasing the structural similarity index (SSIM) by 12.7%, indicating its effectiveness in reconstructing motion trajectories with reduced error. Furthermore, the residual analysis confirms the result that EPRN has lower error variability and less sensitivity to abrupt motion transitions, thus being a more robust solution for real-world applications. The results, therefore, indicate that combining wavelet-transform-based feature extraction with recurrent deep learning significantly enhances the accuracy of motion recognition. The real-life applications of this work include sports performance analysis, real-time motion tracking, and rehabilitation systems. Future work will focus on multimodal data fusion (e.g., video plus wearable sensor data) and also lightweight EPRN variants suitable for real-time applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.