ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for survival in patients with brain metastases from colorectal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Brain metastases from colorectal cancer - a retrospective dual center study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain metastases from colorectal cancer are rare but carry a dismal prognosis. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a prognostic model for individualized survival prediction in affected patients. The model was constructed using a training cohort of 112 patients diagnosed with brain metastases after initial colorectal cancer treatment at our institution between 1985 and 2017, and validated in an external cohort of 114 patients referred for brain metastasis treatment between 1987 and 2017. A nomogram was developed incorporating five variables: age, performance status assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status scale, number of brain metastases, maximum size of brain lesions, and number of prior systemic chemotherapy regimens. In the training cohort, the median survival was 6.6 months, with 1-year and 3-year survival rates of 29.0% and 7.2%. Poorer performance status, multiple metastases, and higher number of chemotherapy regimens were associated with worse prognosis. In the validation cohort, median survival was 5.8 months, with 1-year and 3-year survival rates of 27.0% and 8.4%. Harrell's concordance index was 0.70 for internal validation and 0.63 for external validation. This model may provide a clinically useful tool for individualized survival estimation in patients with brain metastases from colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.