ArticleScientific reports2025
Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages for carbapenem resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex strains.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization of Two Novel Enterobacter Phages With EDTA-Enhanced Antibiofilm Activity.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Article
- A comprehensive analysis of the kinetics of infection of lytic bacteriophages specific to the ESKAPE and critical pathogens.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Genomic, Functional, and Evolutionary Insights into a Novel T7-like Phage B1 Infecting Multidrug-ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There has been an increased interest in phage therapy for the treatment of antimicrobial resistant bacterial infections due to the decreasing effectiveness of antibiotics. While phage therapy has been successful, it often requires time to isolate and characterize phages suitable for phage therapy. Here, we isolated and characterized three phages against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex (ECC) strains to potentially be applied in phage therapy. ECC strains commonly cause sepsis and urinary tract infections in hospitals and are designated as a pathogen of critical importance for its global prevalence and high instance of antimicrobial resistance. Initially, a total of 96 phages were isolated using a collection of diverse clinical ECC strains. Three phages were selected for genome sequencing and additional characterization based on their broad host range and lytic activity. Based on average nucleotide identity (ANI), vB_ECC_YI837 and vB_ECC_MY742 were considered strains of previously isolated phages vB_CsaM_leN and Entb_45, respectively. One phage had an ANI of 92.65% and was therefore considered novel and named vB_ECC_CW742. Furthermore, none of the phages carried toxin, antimicrobial resistance, or lysogeny-related genes. Collectively, the phages covered 82% (108/131) of our carbapenem-resistant ECC strain library. These findings suggest that the three phages are promising candidates for phage therapy against carbapenem-resistant ECC infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.