Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41198750›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Using the improved YOLOv11 model to enhance computer vision applications for building crack detection algorithms.

Xiaohu Gao, Chunmei Cao, Xiaojing Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaohu GaoSchool of Electronics and Information, Jiangsu Vocational College of Business, Nantong, 226011, China. gaoxiaohu1979@163.com.
Chunmei CaoSchool of Electronics and Information, Jiangsu Vocational College of Business, Nantong, 226011, China.
Xiaojing YiSchool of Civil Engineering and Management, Jiangsu Vocational College of Business, Nantong, 226011, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the acceleration of urbanization, building crack detection has become an important task for ensuring the safety of structures. Traditional detection methods face challenges such as low efficiency and high error rates. Deep learning, particularly YOLO series algorithms, has become an effective technology for addressing these issues. This study introduces an enhanced model derived from the YOLOv11 algorithm, designed to improve both the precision and real-time efficiency of building crack detection. The improved YOLOv11 model introduces innovative designs, such as the C3K2-SG module, FPSConv module, and Inner_MPDIoU loss function, which significantly improve crack feature extraction, fine-grained feature fusion, and small target detection accuracy. The C3K2-SG module improves crack detection in complex backgrounds, the FPSConv module optimizes the detection of cracks at various scales, and the Inner_MPDIoU loss function improves the localization of small crack targets. Experimental results show that the enhanced model reaches a detection accuracy (mAP@0.5) of 88.6%, marking a 4.6% increase over the original YOLOv11. Furthermore, the precision and recall rates increased by 3.5% and 7.6%, respectively. The model also provides a detailed comparative analysis of four typical crack types (vertical cracks, horizontal cracks, multi-level cracks, and complex cracks). Compared to YOLOv11, the improved model demonstrates significant advantages in detecting small targets and complex cracks, with an average improvement of 0.12 in detection accuracy. This model offers an efficient and accurate solution for building crack detection and has broad application prospects, especially in intelligent inspection and building safety monitoring.

Identifiers

PMID41198750
PMCPMC12592518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.