Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41198738›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Traits preferences heterogeneity and biofortified cassava varietal adoption among farming households in Southwest, Nigeria.

Oladele Timothy Akinwole, Adetomiwa Kolapo, Adebayo Simeon Bamire, Paul Temegbe Owombo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oladele Timothy AkinwoleDepartment of Agriculture and Industrial Technology, Babcock University, Ilishan- Remon, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Adetomiwa KolapoDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. kolapoadetomiwa@gmail.com.
Adebayo Simeon BamireDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Paul Temegbe OwomboDepartment of Agricultural Economics & Extension, Olusegun Agagu University of Science & Technology, Okitipupa, Ondo State, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Promoting improved crop varietal adoption will prevent a waste of scarce resources deployed to breeding programs for sustained agricultural development in Nigeria. Using household-level survey data, this study aimed to identify farmers' trait preferences and their influence on the adoption of cassava varieties in Southwest, Nigeria. Specifically, it profiled the preferences based on the perspectives of the cassava farming households and determined the factors that influenced the rate and intensity of adoption. The results are in two folds: First, for reasons bordering on the realization of cassava farming households' sustenance and economic goals, early maturing and bigger root size were given preferences among others. Second, education of household head, farm size, extension contacts, and market-related traits were the major drivers of adoption and intensity of adoption of biofortified cassava varieties. Thus, poor market demand was key to the low adoption of biofortified cassava varieties. We suggest that crop development efforts should be tailored to address farmers' concerns. This will undoubtedly increase the adoption rate and also lower the advocacy cost.

Indexed as

AgricultureBiofortificationCrops, AgriculturalManihotAdultFamily CharacteristicsFarmersHumansNigeriaPlant BreedingSurveys and QuestionnairesAdoptionBiofortified cassavaDouble-hurdleNigeriaPreferencesTraits

Identifiers

PMID41198738
PMCPMC12592374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.