Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41198711›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

In situ gut microbiota editing: enhancing therapeutic efficacy for bacterial colitis by compatible oral hydrogel microspheres with phages.

Yufan Yang, Runze Li, Qiang Zhong, Yating Guo, Renwei Wu, Huanchun Chen, Rui Zhou, Ranfeng Ye, Krystyna Dąbrowska, Tomasz K Prajsnar and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Antibiofilm efficacy of phage W5 against antimicrobial-resistantApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yufan YangNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Environment Correlative Dietology, College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Runze LiNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Environment Correlative Dietology, College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Qiang ZhongNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Environment Correlative Dietology, College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Yating GuoNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Environment Correlative Dietology, College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Renwei WuNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Environment Correlative Dietology, College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Huanchun ChenNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Environment Correlative Dietology, College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Rui ZhouNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Environment Correlative Dietology, College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7903-9965
Ranfeng YeNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Environment Correlative Dietology, College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Krystyna DąbrowskaHirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland.
Tomasz K PrajsnarDepartment of Evolutionary Immunology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6562-8630
Graham P StaffordSchool of Clinical Dentistry, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Geng ZouCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China. zougeng19900918@126.com.
Yang ZhouNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Environment Correlative Dietology, College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China. zhouyang@mail.hzau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4801-6733
Jinquan LiNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Environment Correlative Dietology, College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China. lijinquan2007@gmail.com.
Zhiyong SongNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Environment Correlative Dietology, College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China. songzhiyong@mail.hzau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2552-5239

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 22577034National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32322082National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32402264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota editing represents a promising therapeutic strategy for dysbiosis-associated diseases. Bacteriophages (phages), with their host specificity, enable precise microbial manipulation but face challenges such as environmental vulnerability and low bioavailability, which limit their in vivo efficacy. Here, we develop double-responsive hydrogel microspheres (HMs) via electrohydrodynamic spraying to enhance oral phage delivery. Composed of sodium alginate, hyaluronic acid, and Eudragit S100, these HMs achieve 90% encapsulation efficiency for a Salmonella-targeting phage cocktail. Such formulation significantly protects phages from gastric conditions, prolongs their intestinal retention, and enables responsive payload release in the colon. In a murine model of Salmonella Typhimurium (STm)-induced colitis, HMs-encapsulated phages (HMs-Phages) reduce intestinal STm burden by nearly 2000-fold and lower levels of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β) to 60% of those in infected group. Notably, HMs-Phages achieve potent antibacterial efficacy comparable to ciprofloxacin while selectively targeting STm. This targeted strategy circumvents antibiotics-associated microbiota dysbiosis and diarrhea, thereby effectively restoring gut homeostasis and improving host physical health. By integrating targeted pathogen eradication with microbiota conservation, this work provides a precise toolkit for gut microbiota editing and phage therapy, offering substantial advantages over antibiotics for managing dysbiosis-related diseases.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesColitisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHydrogelsMicrospheresPhage TherapyAdministration, OralAlginatesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsColonDisease Models, AnimalDysbiosisFemaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLAlginatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsHydrogelsmethylmethacrylate-methacrylic acid copolymerPolymethacrylic Acids

Identifiers

PMID41198711
PMCPMC12808749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.