ArticleScientific reports2025
A longitudinal latent class growth analysis of PTSD symptom development in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ICU patients exhibit a high incidence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). During treatment, procedural pain (e.g., suctioning, ventilator asynchrony) and communication barriers can trigger significant stress responses, exacerbating feelings of fear and helplessness, ultimately contributing to PTSD post-extubation. Current research predominantly relies on cross-sectional studies, failing to capture the dynamic progression of PTSD. As recovery evolves, patients' psychological and physical states continuously change, necessitating adaptive intervention strategies. There is an urgent need for longitudinal studies to elucidate PTSD development trajectories, clinical characteristics, and risk factors. However, research on the psychological recovery pathways of post-ICU patients remains scarce. This study aimed to identify the heterogeneous developmental trajectories of PTSD in ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation within 6 months post-extubation and to analyze relevant factors across trajectory subgroups. From July 2023 to June 2024, a consecutive sampling method was employed to select mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the ICU of a tertiary hospital in Zunyi, China. At 7 days post-extubation (T0), baseline assessments were conducted using the following instruments: a general information questionnaire, the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ), the short-form Chinese version of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-RSC), and the Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS). Follow-up assessments were performed at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) post-extubation using the IES-R. Data were analyzed using Mplus 8.3 and SPSS 29.0. Prospective longitudinal study. Among 204 completed cases (89.1% retention), four trajectories emerged: high-risk deterioration (6.9%), high-risk improvement (27.2%), medium-risk maintenance (14.3%), and low-risk improvement (51.6%). Lower education, prolonged hospitalization, delayed ICU discharge post-extubation, and baseline anxiety independently predicted adverse trajectories (P < 0.05). PTSD trajectories in mechanically ventilated ICU patients exhibit significant heterogeneity. Clinicians should prioritize screening high-risk subgroups (e.g., less-educated patients, extended hospitalization) for early PTSD intervention to enhance recovery outcomes. Targeted PTSD monitoring and psychological support are recommended for at-risk populations to mitigate long-term mental health burdens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.