ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating machine learning and time-to-event models to explain and predict risk of hospitalization due to dengue in Colombia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tree-Based Machine Learning for Diagnostic Classification of Dengue Fever Using Routine Hematological Parameters: A Secondary Analysis of a Publicly Available Dataset.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Addressing Class Imbalance in Low Birth Weight Prediction: A Quantile-Based Outcome Redefinition Framework Using Colombian Health Surveillance Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arboviral diseases such as dengue pose major public health challenges in endemic regions, notably in Norte de Santander (Colombia), where they place substantial pressure on healthcare services. We analyzed 8,814 confirmed dengue cases reported to the Colombian National Public Health Surveillance System (SIVIGILA) from January 2015 to June 2019 to investigate temporal dynamics and determinants of hospitalization. We applied a dual methodology based on: (i) machine-learning classifiers-logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machines-to predict hospitalization risk from symptom profiles and (ii) Cox models with time-varying coefficients to assess the timing of hospitalization as a function of socio-environmental and clinical predictors, accommodating non-proportional hazards. Our main findings are as follows. On average, patients sought medical attention about four days after symptom onset. Severe and non-severe cases had similar onset-to-hospitalization times, but severe cases were often admitted shortly after the appearance of key warning signs. Abdominal pain and low platelet count markedly increased the risk of hospitalization in classification models and were associated with higher hazards of earlier hospitalization in the time-to-event analysis, with vomiting likewise linked to earlier hospitalization. Among classifiers, random forest achieved the highest predictive accuracy, whereas logistic regression and Cox models yielded interpretable estimates of risk (odds ratios) and timing (time-varying hazard ratios). These findings highlight the value of early recognition of specific symptoms and the integration of machine learning with survival analysis to support proactive, resource-aware dengue management. All analyses were conducted in the R software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.