Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41198677›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

A 10-meter resolution human footprint dataset to support biodiversity and conservation studies in Brazil.

Andrea Presotto, Stuart Hamilton, Patrícia Izar

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea Presotto *Department of Earth, Environment, and Planning, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Stuart Hamilton *Department of Earth, Environment, and Planning, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA. hamiltons22@ecu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8114-7247
Patrícia IzarDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, 05508-030, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing the Human Impact on the Environment in Brazil at 10-meter resolution (HIBR-10) is the first attempt to create an anthropogenic footprint for all of Brazil, accounting for species' scales of interaction across the environment. Mapping humans' impact on the environment in high resolution is critical for habitat conservation when examining these species living in fragmented forests with small-range habitats, such as non-human primates, that coarser datasets may not capture. Here, we designed and implemented a methodology and produced an output geospatial dataset for Brazil at a 10,000 times higher resolution than the currently available datasets. Over 86.5 billion 10 m mapping units were assessed for their level of human impact across a suite of established human impact variables. The input variables were evaluated using a process of cross-validation from comparable datasets obtained from sub-10 cm high-resolution UAV imagery and 30 cm satellite imagery to ensure data integrity. This human impact dataset will support many researchers across disciplines dealing with species-specific conservation needs and is designed to be customizable.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic EffectsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsBrazilEcosystemForestsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41198677
PMCPMC12592384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.