ArticleThe American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry2026
Writing for the Public: A Graduate Seminar in Science Communication.
Article in The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Public trust in research and scientific advances appears to be deteriorating. It behooves us, as researchers and educators, to take more responsibility for improving our communication strategies to reach the public and explain the value and relevance of our work to their lives. To address this need, the Training Program in Population Neuroscience of Aging at the University of Pittsburgh piloted a seminar on writing for the media, focusing on the local Western Pennsylvania audience. Six graduate and postdoctoral trainees in public health attended the seminar. Instructors besides public health faculty included local newspaper editors and science communication specialists working at the National Institutes of Health, at an advocacy organization, and at our university's own communications program. In weekly seminar sessions, instructors discussed audiences, motivations, and formats for science writing. Trainees pitched story ideas, shared proposed outlines, and obtained ongoing feedback from instructors and fellow trainees. Over the course of several weeks, trainees prepared op-ed style articles for potential newspaper publication. Four of the six trainees succeeded in publishing articles in the local newspaper. A course to learn how to write for the public is both feasible and needed in academic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.