Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41198421›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2026

Delayed convergence of iterative reconstruction in dopamine transporter SPECT with multiple-pinhole collimators.

Loreen Jedid, Thomas Buddenkotte, Ivayla Apostolova, Laurin Bruer, Erik Jámbor, Susanne Klutmann, Melinda Szolikova, Attila Forgács, Svend Hvidsten, Ralph Buchert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Loreen JedidDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Thomas BuddenkotteDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Ivayla ApostolovaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Laurin BruerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Erik JámborMediso Ltd., Laborc utca 3, Budapest H-1037, Hungary.
Susanne KlutmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Melinda SzolikovaMediso Ltd., Laborc utca 3, Budapest H-1037, Hungary.
Attila ForgácsMediso Ltd., Laborc utca 3, Budapest H-1037, Hungary.
Svend HvidstenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, Odense C 5000, Denmark.
Ralph BuchertDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany. Electronic address: r.buchert@uke.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple-pinhole (MPH) collimators for brain SPECT improve the resolution-sensitivity tradeoff compared with conventional parallel-hole and fan-beam collimators. The system count sensitivity profile with MPH collimators exhibits a peak at the center of the field-of-view and significant decline in count sensitivity toward the periphery. In MPH SPECT with [

methods671 patients (43.8% females, 67.3±11.3y) were included retrospectively. Projection data were acquired with a triple-head camera (Mediso AnyScan Trio) equipped with 2

resultsIterative reconstruction converged much slower in the extrastriatal reference region than in the striatum and its subregions. Considerable improvement of spatial resolution with increasing iteration number came with an acceptable increase of statistical noise. The discriminative power of the putaminal SBR was highest with 300 effective iterations. There was a small but significant reduction of reader confidence and between-readers agreement with 300 compared to 24 iterations, particularly in normal cases (Likert 6-score 2.325 versus 2.468, p < 0.001).

conclusions300 iterations provide a good compromise between spatial resolution, robustness and diagnostic power of semi-quantitative SBR analyses on one side versus statistical noise and between-readers variability on the other side. In order to avoid relevant loss of between-readers stability, readers should be specifically trained for reading [

Indexed as

BrainDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAgedAlgorithmsDopaminergic ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiopharmaceuticalsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTropanes2-carbomethoxy-8-(3-fluoropropyl)-3-(4-iodophenyl)tropaneDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsRadiopharmaceuticalsTropanescollimatorconvergencedopamine transporteriterative reconstructionmultiple-pinholeSPECT

Identifiers

PMID41198421
PMCPMC13589428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.