Trial reportThe European respiratory journal2026
Mepolizumab for the treatment of refractory chronic cough in patients with eosinophilic airways disease (MUCOSA): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in The European respiratory journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mepolizumab for the treatment of refractory chronic cough in patients with eosinophilic airways disease (MUCOSA): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial.The European respiratory journal · 2026Trial
- Article
- ERS Congress 2025: highlights from the Airway Diseases Assembly.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Reply to: Is the role of eosinophils in refractory chronic cough truly dismissed? Mepolizumab reduced blood and sputum eosinophils, but not eosinophil-derived neurotoxin.The European respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Neuroplasticity and neuroimmune interactions with type 2 inflammation in asthma.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- Phenotypes and endotypes of cough in asthma.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePatients presenting with chronic cough often have eosinophilic airways disease that remains refractory despite inhaled or oral corticosteroids. Studies in asthma patients have shown that eosinophils co-localise with airway sensory nerves, and after allergen challenge, are associated with neuronal sensitivity. We evaluated whether mepolizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-5, reduces cough in patients with eosinophilic airways disease.
methodsWe conducted a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial of 30 patients with refractory chronic cough and eosinophilic airways disease (sputum eosinophils ≥2%). Patients underwent 1:1 randomisation to receive subcutaneous mepolizumab (100 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Change from baseline in 24-h cough frequency at 14 weeks represented the primary end-point. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsCompared to placebo, mepolizumab did not lead to improvements in 24-h cough frequency at 14 weeks (percentage change relative to placebo +18.0%, 95% CI -46.4-160.1%; p=0.99). We found no between-group differences in awake cough frequency, sleep cough frequency, cough severity on the 100-mm visual analogue scale, and quality of life on the Leicester Cough Questionnaire. Mepolizumab significantly reduced blood eosinophils compared to placebo at week 14 (mean difference -237.7 cells·µL
conclusionIn patients with refractory chronic cough and persistent eosinophilia despite inhaled corticosteroid therapy, mepolizumab did not improve cough despite reducing blood and sputum eosinophils. Targeting eosinophils might not impact cough in these patients, and their cough is probably driven by alternative mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.